Magazine topic: 
Entertainment
Total votes: 100

3D or not 3D? That is the question

34
by : 
Becca Eustis

In the 20th century everything changed for cinema. First came silent movies, then ‘talkies’ (films with sound) and then colour films. The 21st century has also seen a new step forward in film technology: the 3D revolution. Just five years ago it was very rare to see a 3D film at a mainstream cinema, but in 2010 50% of the ten highest grossing films of the year were 3D. What caused this sudden change? Is it a good thing? Are 3D films here to stay?

The first 3D film was shown to a paying audience in 1920, but throughout the 20th century the technology remained a gimmick – a clever trick to enjoy at Disneyland and nothing more. In the 1980s, as technology improved, 3D became more popular in mainstream cinema. However, it was only low-brow films, such as Jaws 3D, which made use of the new technology. Then, in 2009, there was Avatar. At $237 million, Avatar is one of the most expensive films ever to be made, but it’s also the highest grossing one. As well as being popular with cinema-goers, the film pleased critics, and was nominated for nine Academy Awards (it won three). Avatar’s huge success started the 3D revolution, and in 2011 alone 42 different 3D films will be shown in cinemas across Britain and America.

3D films are obviously very popular. The technology truly immerses you in the film and makes you feel like you’re part of the action. It can make you believe that you’re on Avatar’s planet Pandora when in fact you’re actually just sat in the cinema on a wet Tuesday afternoon. 3D films reach out to the audience (quite literally, in some cases) in a way that perhaps normal 2D films do not. Audiences worldwide have shown they enjoy being more involved in a film and the popularity of 3D films has helped improve box-office sales during the economic crisis, when people don’t usually spend extra money on entertainment. Even if you don’t like 3D films, you should perhaps still be grateful to the technology for making studios money during the recession, enabling them to carry on making great cinema in both 2D and 3D.

However, what’s good for film studios isn’t always good for audiences. 3D film tickets do cost more than normal cinema tickets, and you must decide if seeing a film in 3D is worth the extra money. While some people say that 3-D technology makes films more involving, surely that’s the purpose of the script, acting and direction? If a film’s budget is being spent on 3D then less is being spent on these three things, which used to be all a film needed to make it involving. What’s more, several films are being turned into 3D after they have been made in 2D, rather than being made in 3D from the start. This produces a weaker effect and can be seen as a way of studios cashing in on the popularity of 3D whilst actually creating an inferior product. For example, why did Disney need to re-release The Lion King in 3D? How much did the new technology add to a film that was already fantastic? Was it enough to justify the higher ticket prices? Not only are some studios charging higher prices for lower-quality films, but many people get headaches from wearing 3D glasses, which ruins the experience. It’s possible that the new, popular technology is still not advanced enough to be more than a passing craze, and film-makers that misuse the technology and produce weak films will lessen the popularity of 3D.

Although it is clear that there are problems with 3D, both with the technology itself and the way it is used by greedy studios, many hope that these are just teething problems. In terms of mainstream cinema, 3D technology is still very young, so it’s understandable that there have been (and still are) issues with it. It is important to remember that films with sound and colour were once new, exciting and uncertain technologies, but they both survived! Furthermore, even if a film is released in 3D, most cinemas will also show it in 2D, so that those who prefer the good old cinema experience can still enjoy the film in the ‘normal’ way. With over 20 3D films planned for release in 2012 it seems that the technology will remain popular for another year at least, but only time will tell if 3D is truly the future of cinema.

Discussion

Have you seen any film in 3D? What did you think? Tell us about your experience!

Comments

wdw2017's picture
0x
0x
wdw2017 14 November, 2017 - 13:12

in my opinion i think it really depend on the type of movie/film that's 3D as not all movies are good to made 3D.

up
4 users have voted.
Amilmalinde's picture
-1x
0x
Amilmalinde 13 November, 2017 - 15:35

I personally don't like 3D films, due to the fact that a lot of them are not made to be 3D. This means that the film isn't any more effective than it would be without the uncomfortable glasses. I am yet to see a 3D film that I enjoy.

up
6 users have voted.
Toma English's picture
23904x
138x
Toma English 15 October, 2013 - 08:38

I watched 1D This Is Us in 3D and I liked it a lot ♥ I really want to watch it again ♥

up
32 users have voted.
Ilehana's picture
7130x
39x
Ilehana 19 August, 2013 - 22:00

I think this technology is awesome! but most of the films have few 3D effects, the rest of the movie is in a ''normal way'' so you feel anger when you discover that you've paid more than usual for just 3 o 4 scenes in 3D format.

up
30 users have voted.
Jonathan - Coordinator's picture
105873x
779x
Jonathan - Coor... 20 August, 2013 - 05:26

Hi diana777. I've never heard of that. What's a 9D film?
Jonathan (LearnEnglish Teens Team)

up
30 users have voted.
hayaalhams's picture
7300x
49x
hayaalhams 19 June, 2013 - 10:38

yes i have ... and i will to try it again because it was so intresting and exiting

up
30 users have voted.
Alina Serg's picture
308x
2x
Alina Serg 20 May, 2013 - 16:53

Our cinemas like to show people 3-D films too.Of course,it`s amazing,when you can touch some pictures on the screen,but what I don`t like the most are the glasses.It`s very uncomfortable.
One day,I saw,that there is the premiere of the Titanic 3-d,and as I have never seen it before,I took a decision to go to the cinema.At first, there were no any stunning effects,but directors could do it,because Titanic has many exciting moments.Secondly,I couldn`t cry in these terrible glasses.You know,it is impossible,not to weep watching Titanic,so each time,when I wanted to do it,I pulled off my glasses.
But Avatar 3D was something amazing.When I watched it,I really thought that I am this blue man,and I live in Pandora.
So,of course,3D films are more interesting and amazing,and I advise you to watch something 3D.

up
35 users have voted.
spongebob's picture
8846x
94x
spongebob 12 May, 2013 - 16:56

yes, i have seen a film in 3D. The film was " Step up revolution"
It was amazing.

up
38 users have voted.
Natalija's picture
113639x
804x
Natalija 23 March, 2013 - 09:00

Yes, I have watched a film in 3D, but I find it not better to usual watching without 3D.

up
25 users have voted.
Miley's picture
11142x
105x
Miley 15 March, 2013 - 12:11

It is so great to watch a movie in 3-D but its not only 3-D which make the movie better..is the movie itself..i really liked the movie even than the next time i saw it in 2-D..

up
30 users have voted.
merlin's picture
6855x
62x
merlin 10 February, 2013 - 17:54

i have see a lot of films 3D and i think is the same thing as we see a normal film without 3D .ok the first time i was excited but i dont see a big difference .

up
27 users have voted.